Information

7.4: Environmental Policy - Biology

7.4: Environmental Policy - Biology


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Introduction

It is not uncommon to think of the sustainability paradigm as being a recent interpretation of environmental policy, one that was given credence by the United Nations report "Our Common Future" (the Brundtland Report) when it was first presented in 1987. However, it would be a mistake to conclude that sustainability as a mental construct and policy framework for envisioning the relationship of humans and nature came into being suddenly and at a single moment in time. Most environmental historians who have studied U.S. policy have discerned at least three distinct periods during which new concepts and ideas, scientific understandings, technological advances, political institutions, and laws and regulations came or were brought into being in order to understand and manage human impacts on the environment.

  1. The American conservation movement: This 19th century movement had the main objective for conservation of American land and resources, it grew from opposite philosophies. On one side you had people like Gifford Pinchot (first head of the US National Forest Service) that were very pragmatic about their desire for conservation. For example, these people observed that policies for harvesting some resource (like lumber) were not sustainable, so they began conservation/sustainability research and new policies so the resource would not run out in the foreseeable future. On the other side were people like John Muir and Theodore Roosevelt that saw land/habitats/wildlife as intrinsic entities, meaning that had value in their own right (meaning nothing to do with money).
  2. The rise of environmental risk management as a basis for policy: The beginnings of environmental risk management can be traced to the fields of public health, industrial hygiene, and sanitary engineering, which came into prominence in the latter decades of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th. The spread of disease was a particularly troublesome problem as the country continued to urbanize. In addition, environmental scientists of the day were alarmed by the extent and degree of damage that they were documenting. The publication of Silent Spring in 1962 by Rachel Carson (1907-1964), about the impact of the widespread and indiscriminate use of pesticides, was a watershed moment, bringing environmental concerns before a large portion of the American, and global, public. Carson, collected scientifically documented evidence on the effects of pesticides, particularly DDT, heptachlor, and dieldrin, on humans and mammals, and the systemic disruption they caused to ecosystems. Silent Spring is credited with bringing about a ban on the use of DDT in the United States, and setting in motion a chain of events that would ultimately result in the transformation of environmental public policy from one based on the problems and attitudes that brought about nineteenth century conservation, to one based on the management of risks from chemical toxins. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was established in 1970, just eight years after the publication of Silent Spring. The same year Earth Day was created.
  3. The integration of social and economic factors to create what we now refer to as the sustainability paradigm: Eventually, we (humanity) realized that in order to solve environmental issues (like ones identified by Rachel Carson), that the "human factors" (both social and economical) had to be accounted for. This is what defines the sustainability paradigm: environmental, social, and economic disciplines. Only Band-Aid solutions can be applied if we only take a one-minded approach.

History of Environmental Policy

Environmental policies are typically driven by problems of the day, real and perceived, that require systemic solutions. For example:

  • Early conservationists were alarmed at the inefficiencies of human resource management and the encroachment of humans on unspoiled lands... Leading to conservation legislation.
  • During the 20th century many groups (scientists, economists, politicians, and ordinary citizens) became alarmed and fearful of the consequences of toxic pollutant loads to the environment that included localized effects on human health and well-being... Leading to clean air and water legislation.
  • As we proceed into the 21st century, an array of complex problems that have the potential to alter substantially the structure and well-being of large segments of human societies, calls for a renewal and reassessment of our approach to environmental policy.

This has, thus far, proven to be a difficult transition. Many of these complex problems have multiple causes and impacts, affect some groups of people more than others, are economically demanding, and are often not as visibly apparent to casual observers as previous impacts, nor are the benefits perceived to be commensurate with costs. Devising a regulatory strategy for such problems requires an adaptive and flexible approach that current laws do not foster.

Table (PageIndex{a}): Table illustrating evolution of environmental policy. Table by Sustainability: A Comprehensive Foundation in Openstax (CC-BY)

1850-19201960-19901990-Present

Focus

Conservation/sanitationMedia/site/problem specificComplex regional/ global problems
OutcomeLand preservation/efficiency/control of diseaseManage anthropocentric and ecological riskGlobal sustainable development
Principal ActivityResource management reform/simple contaminant controlsCompliance/remediation/technological emphasis on problem solvingIntegration of social, economic, and technological information for holistic problem solving
Economic FocusProfit maximization/public healthCost minimizationStrategic investments/long-term societal well-being
Regulatory ActivityLowHeavyAdaptive and flexible
Conceptual ModelExpansion vs preservationCommand and controlSystems/life cycle approach
Disciplinary Approach Disciplinary and insularMultidisciplinaryInterdisciplinary/integrative

Table (PageIndex{b}): Table illustrating major environmental legislation, society, and organization conceptions. Table by Rachel Schleiger (CC-BY-NC)

Year

Policy/Society/Organization Conception
1899

Refuse Act

1905National Forest Service
1916National Park Service
1918Migratory Bird Treaty Act
1930'sState Parks
1948Federal Water Pollution Control Act
1950The Nature Conservancy
1955Air Pollution Control Act
1961World Wildlife Federation
1963Clean Air Act (1970, 1977, 1990 updates)
1965Solid Waste Disposal Act (1976 update)
1965Water Quality Act (1987 update)
1967Air Quality Act
1969National Environmental Policy Act
1970Occupational Safety and Health Act
1970Environmental Protection Agency
1971Occupational Safety and Health Administration
1972Consumer Product Safety Act
1972Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
1972Clean Water Act (1977 update)
1972Noise Control Act
1973Endangered Species Act
1974Safe Drinking Water Act (1986, 1996 updates)
1975Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
1976Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
1976Toxic Substances Control Act
1980CERCLA (Superfund)
1984Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
1986Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
1986Emergency Wetlands Resources Act
1990Oil Pollution Act
1993North American Free Trade Agreement
2003Healthy Forest Initiative


Watch the video: Η Βιολογία και το κεντρικό δόγμα της (February 2023).